Please upgrade your web browser as Internet Explorer 6 is no longer supported. Upgrade to IE8 or Install Firefox.

Sydney
Level 6, 1 Castlereagh St, Sydney
1800 25 1800

Parramatta
Ground Floor, 30 Cowper St, Parramatta
1800 25 1800

Liverpool
Suite 9, Level 2,
215-219 George St, Liverpool
1800 25 1800

Newcastle
83 King Street, Newcastle
1800 13 1800

Canberra
43-49 Geils Crt, Deakin
1800 23 1800

Wollongong
Level 1, 1 Burrelli Street, Wollongong
1800 25 1800

LIABILITY FOR WORK CAUSED PSYCHIATRIC ILLNESS


In order to recover compensation for a psychiatric condition allegedly caused in the workplace, a worker, pursuant to the Safety Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 37696 (C'th) must establish that the condition comprised an "injury" within the meaning of the Act. To establish that, it is necessary to show that the employment, or employment factors, was a contributing factor to the disease or condition.

Frequently Comcare and other government agencies, suggest that as there was no obvious fault in the workplace system, the workplace could not have contributed or caused the particular psychiatric condition. This seeks to introduce the concept of "fault" into the relevant causation test. Although changes are being considered by the Federal Government at the moment, the Act in its present form does not require any such proof.

The Federal Court in the matter of Rodriguez v Telstra Corporation Limited confirmed that all that was necessary was for the employee to show that the workplace had been a material contributing factor to the development of the employee's major depressive disorder. It was not necessary that the employee showed that there was a special, or unusual or wrongful factor of his employment which was the contributing factor. Once it was shown that the employment contributed to the development of the depression, that was sufficient.

It is a timely reminder that in seeking evidence about the contribution or causation component, the focus should be on proving, not that the employer necessarily did anything wrong, but that the workplace factors caused or contributed to the illness.


DISCLAIMER


These personal injury law articles were published with the express permission of Stacks/The Law Firm. Please note that the information was correct at the time of publication, but personal injury law is subject to legislation changes from time to time and thus it is recommended that you contact a Stacks/Goudkamp lawyer should you have any questions relating to any of the topics above.

If you are in need of legal advice, contact Stacks/Goudkamp today. Stacks/Goudkamp is a Sydney based law firm with Accredited Specialists in Personal Injury Law and Compensation matters. We are situated in the heart of the Sydney CBD and also have offices in Parramatta, Liverpool, Newcastle, Wollongong and Canberra. Call us today on 1800 25 1800 or alternatively, fill out the form on the right.

Name:
Email:
Phone:
Please enter your postcode:
Which office would suit you best?
When did the accident happen?
Do you have legal representation?
Any other information you'd like us to know before we contact you?

11/08/2010 | WHO IS THE ‘NOMINAL DEFENDANT’?  What happens if you fall foul of someone else's bad driving on the roads but can’t identify the person responsible...

29/07/2010 | STATE REFUSES TO FUND MARALINGA COURT BATTLE  The Rann government in South Australia has refused to meet with representatives of Aboriginal people affected by British nuclear tests...

23/07/2010 | $7.5M FOR HIT-RUN TEEN GEORGINA WOODS  She hates school, dreams of being a veterinarian & loves her family pets. Georgina Woods' mum Julie describes her 13-year-old as a typical teenager, except every day is a struggle since a cowardly hit-&-run driver left Georgina for dead...